Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50978 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2009 12:21:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2009 12:21:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 43003 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2009 12:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 42974 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2009 12:21:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ivy-user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 42964 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2009 12:21:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:21:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of miguel.griffa@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.226] (HELO mail-bw0-f226.google.com) (209.85.218.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:21:34 +0000 Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so37319bwz.23 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:21:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tZlBMhLnUWwAltmljgYygkjtNPl6F1wzgcRKGb/s174=; b=dQFkJ5JSnF0wzD1uqZfTdK6JeagOl/f4d9OYmMrzee40sW7+jIGwcEGanlW+VCK1DE ptGRUG6E9gBLp6LLuKpOxjEV8OOboyUxuiKK4/Tb0EhS5IcvP7JZSkG4VTs/4SJr1hTR TvEzbuUwa8NlHNa6PcuyWE4d5ZgK1a/lsMed4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qwrJdP1bU0eN+0AvR+dYSxRM3vcSpoI3BOA99/OH0/aon3XOGIKabt6pA9BB9Gw2ii S90M26+iin3uHJJCJek/Llu9kQCzAl3qVpkgvXEhMEXLdl209T07XdkNJ1v+JnlJ9psZ yOl/zzlTtNvioSQUhFPoraVg4fC5znIPXlWRs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.7.197 with SMTP id e5mr888610bke.184.1252585273926; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:21:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000701ca320d$76926630$63b73290$@de> References: <000701ca320d$76926630$63b73290$@de> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:21:13 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is there a real(!) advantage of Ivy over placing the depends in the VCS From: Miguel Griffa To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c37404da4200473383ca7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c37404da4200473383ca7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Personally I addressed this issue by creating acustom repository (a simple dir actually). It is also usefull to migrate jars from VCS, since when I migrate a project, I copy jars from project to our repo. If jars are available on the net, better, but I get sure with this setup. Ivy lets you configure patterns in sucha a way that you only need on dir with jars. Hope this helps Miguel On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Sebastian Krysmanski < sebastian@krysmanski.de> wrote: > Hello, > > recently someone recommended Ivy to me because he saw that we were hosting > our project dependencies in our Subversion repository. I took this > opportunity to have a look at Ivy and on first glance Ivy seemed very nice. > However I see a major disadvantage over dependencies in a VCS repository: > If > a project is dormant for a longer period of time an artifact (i.e. a > library) may longer be available (in a certain, required version or the > repository may not exist anymore). > > If we were using Ivy this would result in the project no longer being able > to be built. If we're placing the libraries in our SVN repository however, > the project could still be built. How does Ivy "address" this drawback? Is > there any commonly used solution to solve this problem? > > Regards > Sebastian > > -- --- Miguel Griffa --0015174c37404da4200473383ca7--