ant-ivy-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Adams <>
Subject RE: bug fixed
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:56:14 GMT
I think it is a bug. I see that C does have a dependency on D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maarten Coene []
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:52 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: bug fixed
> I don't think this is a bug.
> If your new C doesn't has a dependency on D, why should Ivy resolve it?
> And if B needs D in order to function properly, you should maybe add a direct dependency
from B to D?
> Maarten
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Shawn Castrianni <>
> To: "" <>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:44:16 PM
> Subject: bug fixed
> I have not upgraded to the latest ivy 2.0 yet, but have a question.  The version I am
currently using was built
> from source a while ago, can't remember when.  The bug I find is this:
> C depends on D
> A depends on C (non-transitively)
> B depends on C
> E depends on A and B
>        E
>     A      B
>        C
>        D
> so you get the above diamond problem.  My problem is the conflict resolution at C combined
with the non-
> transitive dependency between A and C.  If A depends on a newer C than B does, conflict
management takes the
> most recent C via A, but then the non-transitive nature of that dependency wins and I
get NO D at all.  D is
> still needed by B so I get missing dependencies.  I don't think non-transitive dependencies
should prevent
> transitive dependencies from being retrieved if another transitive path is available
that need those
> dependencies.  Is this considered a bug and is it fixed in the latest IVY 2.0?  If this
is not a bug, what do I
> do to fix this?
> ---
> Shawn Castrianni
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information
for the sole use
> of the intended recipient.  Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is
strictly prohibited.  If
> you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended
recipient), please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

View raw message