Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xavier.hanin@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=yDtEJ1rNl3HDUH8b+pmyAjlJXJErpia74mCpkREZjYnLaiVgmzpJnE7hjbezBK9Pj2Xdvp1PEhf0Ld7GpX01zh9Yu9buaBVoBlMT8BhaEYb4TWqmsBI2nso+6iKIdO3Pq5EkU9ofW3+IXMuMdYmwyhjrxLUxZaR1YSNcB+NDWAU=
Message-ID: <635a05060802070233m40026f4ch5133de98d97edcb4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:33:51 +0100
From: "Xavier Hanin" <xavier.hanin@gmail.com>
To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org, dbenua@panix.com
Subject: Re: Configuration from remote repositories
In-Reply-To: <47AADD4D.8040108@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_19448_32590259.1202380431560"
References: <47AA27DE.1040705@panix.com>
	 <635a05060802061353w6a70c9aerd49a4d1dcaa2fc46@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47AA51B6.20808@panix.com>
	 <635a05060802070054i7fb2959dk5f7ac3ee2b3f3483@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47AADD4D.8040108@panix.com>

------=_Part_19448_32590259.1202380431560
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Feb 7, 2008 11:28 AM, David Benua <dbenua@panix.com> wrote:

> Xavier,
>
> In my usage scenario, any sub-project that needs to "publish" (i.e. a
> reusable library module) will need BOTH resolvers.  They will use the
> HTTP resolver to "retrieve" their dependencies, and the SFTP resolver to
>  "publish" their artifacts after a build.
>
> Subprojects which don't publish (because their code isn't re-used by
> other applications / customers) just "retrieve" from HTTP, they don't
> need SFTP at all. (These subprojects are still in SVN, just not in Ivy).
>
> I did this for 2 reasons:
> 1) Performance of the HTTP resolver is much faster, and some of our
> users are a long way away over slow VPN or SSH connections.
> 2) We can give wide access to everybody (HTTP allows public
> reading/browsing) and control updates more tightly.

It makes a lot of sense, I misunderstood your use case.

Xavier


>
>
> Dave
>
>
> Xavier Hanin wrote:
> >
> > Since only one of the two resolvers is used at a time (if I understand
> > correctly), I'd rather define only one in two different settings files
> > (with the same name), and include either one or the other file depending
> > on the environment. You can do this with a naming convention for the
> > file name and using a property to define which file to load. But it's
> > mainly a matter of taste, behavior should be the same.
> >
> > Xavier
>
>


-- 
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/

------=_Part_19448_32590259.1202380431560--