Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dyhodge@gmail.com designates
 64.233.170.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=i7KJpyzXPBnvywOUGWXP0LD/mSapSd9aikNlg3xBowEbE8JB55nDTQqDKx40pwn+LfAEx6YkOIvmWbJUsEMM90izOqoNkVDdItfCmBNXlpui0jPJsQ8jmcKpBHDBzWvVR7t00q+I9e5R0S7fdYQ8prtouQi8+FuRVcIKdi5FAUM=
Message-ID: <4bb374d70711010455h4c2f61f5y233d5b1e2743c4a8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 07:55:48 -0400
From: "David Hodge" <dyhodge@gmail.com>
To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: IVY resolving POMs with Revision ${project.revision}
In-Reply-To: <635a05060711010039y18e51c5dtf37786b9743cf2dd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_8885_9460375.1193918148733"
References: <637453.15887.qm@web30814.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	 <4bb374d70710312118i41f98b07r89488ec90ca06e9b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <635a05060711010039y18e51c5dtf37786b9743cf2dd@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_8885_9460375.1193918148733
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Here you go, and thanks.

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/mortbay/jetty/jetty-plus/6.1.5/jetty-plus-6.1.5.pom

David Y. Hodge

On 11/1/07, Xavier Hanin <xavier.hanin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/1/07, David Hodge <dyhodge@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks I am using the latest version and it is indeed fixed. Have
> another
> > question that I think is related
> > I have a dependency on jett-plus,
>
>
> Could you provide a link to the POM so that we can see how it is written?
>
> however it depends on geronimo-spec-jta
> > and it ends up looking for this url causing a problem:
> >
> >
> >
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/geronimo-spec/geronimo-spec-jta/${jta-spec-version}/geronimo-spec-jta-${jta-spec-version}.pom
> >
> > I took a glance at the bug fix for the project.version issue but I am
> not
> > sure how this should be handled.
>
>
> I don't know how the jta-spec-version is provided in the POM, but I don't
> think this is a standard  property. As a workaround for the moment you can
> provide a value to this property in Ivy or Ant: <property
> name="jta-spec-version"
> value="1.0-M1" />
>
> Xavier
>
> Thanks,
> >
> > David Y. Hodge
> >
> > On 10/30/07, Maarten Coene <maarten_coene@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This has been fixed in trunk (cfr.
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-620)
> > > The best you could do is to try it again with the latest Ivy snapshot
> > >
> > > --
> > > Maarten
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: David Hodge <dyhodge@gmail.com>
> > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 2:34:37 PM
> > > Subject: IVY resolving POMs with Revision ${project.revision}
> > >
> > >
> > > I am trying to use Ivy to download a dependency, SLF4J, and I get an
> > > error
> > > because the revision is not 1.4.3 but is ${project.revision}  What is
> > > the
> > > best way to get around this?  Turning off using POMS?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > David Y. Hodge
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> http://xhab.blogspot.com/
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
> http://www.xoocode.org/
>

------=_Part_8885_9460375.1193918148733--