Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ivy-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 42795 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2007 13:27:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2007 13:27:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 15955 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2007 13:27:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ivy-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15943 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2007 13:27:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ivy-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15934 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2007 13:27:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:27:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of llignhoj@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.190] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:27:33 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1821272rvb for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:27:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=2hk8N4q7/elBCb/VIQf2MxGB4v7kVF82bgqL7fDnIOc=; b=BIfU3O9x9/cJ4RjU/RLqPrfvWc5FGKk9Y7ciprxhLRJKfE8LU/izPLNKNt8Maog2azxdkFqr4FlOi7EGHSa98ZmYw4qcB0qeVWBjvs7LzPTNszv3LtFI6u75TcGa1Ojk3QSN8yTrpaLObxihwI787EQjWiPUAXk41FfimCwxCX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DA9vGJ5y/zl5tTKdXzBUWArIWfxfDCpvEOdjA7BHbT7Sx4uc+wrA6QSrkzTVV/oKSaRAsi3xb3XPmAiv52YRRWohEkrNogolHfHGaJclPsgbK/zeq5LxCYs7fS9DZaNalANcOIB4/rrGGHJ4i6atukZqNf82wSiarizvQ5CMPXs= Received: by 10.141.180.5 with SMTP id h5mr1069026rvp.1190726832612; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.28.18 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49c77ae40709250627ma68b058s90e2e7919ca22de1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:27:12 +0800 From: "John Gill" To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Central version numbering. In-Reply-To: <635a05060709242257w36cdcce9l4131cf404bfc2d47@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_286_2163317.1190726832592" References: <917352.61192.qm@web30806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <635a05060709210755m4c988f08yff1e49462f5a919c@mail.gmail.com> <49c77ae40709210807k5bfed6dbjf52392dd342e7942@mail.gmail.com> <635a05060709210850r731c6b1maae4dca1452a75e6@mail.gmail.com> <49c77ae40709222137p456f7063q30ea3aba029e04b1@mail.gmail.com> <635a05060709240006pe5e7554n9351c23541ddeaac@mail.gmail.com> <49c77ae40709240139ye51697cg3493d4d6b23d1bd0@mail.gmail.com> <635a05060709240158g4a39977ap7a5fa1b67148ce1a@mail.gmail.com> <49c77ae40709241801r60df692fv199225b0a57f631d@mail.gmail.com> <635a05060709242257w36cdcce9l4131cf404bfc2d47@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_286_2163317.1190726832592 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I have created issue IVY-609 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-609) On 9/25/07, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > Could you open a JIRA issue for that? For the name I like "now" too for > the > same reason. > > Xavier > > On 9/25/07, John Gill wrote: > > > > OK forget the "shutdown" trigger. I don't mind what you call the > > "on-startup" trigger. I like "now" as it is nice and short, but > > "immediate" > > or "immediately" is probably more technically correct. > > > > On 9/24/07, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > > > > On 9/24/07, John Gill wrote: > > > > > > > > I understand the issues with introducing filterchains into > > ivysettings, > > > > which is why I thought I'd better ask first. > > > > > > > > Yes, the trigger idea sounds like a much better idea. > > > > > > > > I am guessing I would have something like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > target="make-ivy-properties" > > > > event="on-startup"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've made a guess at the name of the event as "on-startup" (and it > > > should > > > > call the target as soon as the trigger definition is detected). > > > > In addition, it might pay to round out the functionality and add an > > > > "on-shutdown" event as well (although I'm not sure what I would use > > this > > > > for > > > > personally, but I'm sure someone will want it :-). > > > > > > > > > on-startup is not too bad, but what do you think of "immediately" or > > > "now"? > > > For the on-shutdown, I'm not sure what we can call a shutdown in > Ivy... > > we > > > are never sure there won't be any further call. > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 9/23/07, John Gill wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, I've just had an idea! > > > > > > > > > > > > If the ivy properties tag ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/history/trunk/configuration/properties.html > > > > > > ) > > > > > > supported filterchains that ant has, then I could load my > > > > > depends.xmlwhich > > > > > > is in the form > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And then in my filterchain, run a series of regex filters on the > > > file > > > > to > > > > > > turn it into a property file. > > > > > > > > > > > > So I would have something like (not sure the regex is exactly > > > correct) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flags="gi"/> > > > > > > > > > > > replace="\1=\2" flags="gi"/> > > > > > > > > > > > flags="gi"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Obviously, it would be nice if it supported the full set of > > > > filterchains > > > > > > that ANT uses, and I guess ivy could probably just use the ant > > > classes > > > > > to > > > > > > do > > > > > > all the work. > > > > > > > > > > > > How viable do you think such an enhancement would be Xavier? If > > you > > > > > > support > > > > > > the idea, I'll try to implement it and submit a patch. Is there > > any > > > > > reason > > > > > > why ivy can't be dependent on ant filterchain classes? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ivy tries to depend on as few dependencies as possible. And I'm > not > > > sure > > > > > if > > > > > adding filterchains is really something that belongs to the scope > of > > > > Ivy. > > > > > That being said, I understand your need. Maybe we could find > another > > > way > > > > > to > > > > > address it. An idea from the top of my head: why not add a way to > > call > > > a > > > > > trigger from an ivysettings file? Then you could call an an target > > > > before > > > > > loading the properties file. Since we already support triggers, > this > > > > > should > > > > > be easy to do and can solve a lot of problems when using Ivy > outside > > > > Ant. > > > > > What do you think ? > > > > > > > > > > Also, can I load two properties files, because I would like > > something > > > > like > > > > > > this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you can load multitple properties files, no problem. > > > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > On 9/21/07, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, you need one settings file for each Project. But > > > those > > > > > > > settings files are very simple and do not require any > > maintenance: > > > > > they > > > > > > > only > > > > > > > import one property file and one settings file. Using ant > > > > substitution > > > > > > as > > > > > > > you do is fine, but the developer has to remember to run the > ant > > > > > > > substitution tasks each time they change a property or the ivy > > > > file... > > > > > > and > > > > > > > developers are lazy :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/21/07, John Gill wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only problem I have had with that idea, is if your > > > properties > > > > > are > > > > > > > > different for each build, then you need lots of different > ivy > > > > > setting > > > > > > > > files > > > > > > > > just for ivyDE (or am I missing something). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/21/07, Xavier Hanin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/21/07, Foreman, Alex (IT) < > > > > > Alexander.Foreman@morganstanley.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry Its last Friday and my brain wasn't working > > perfectly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am able to do this from the command line fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I add it to the eclipseIDE when It resolves the > file > > It > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > add > > > > > > > > > > the properties in. They are both pointing to the same > > > > > > > ivysettings.xml > > > > > > > > > > so they both have the properties loaded. However when > you > > > > > resolve > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > eclipse not via ANT it doesn't do this subsitution so it > > > > cannot > > > > > > find > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > version:( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eg cannot find [mylib | module | ${common.version}] <-- > > not > > > > > > > replaced > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > eclipse but works in ant :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's usually because you define properties in Ant and not > in > > > Ivy > > > > > > > > settings. > > > > > > > > > Are you sure the properties file is loaded in your ivy > > > settings? > > > > > If > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > prefer to load them in Ant for your Ant build, then you > can > > > use > > > > a > > > > > > > > settings > > > > > > > > > file only for IvyDE which just import your main settings > > > (those > > > > > you > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > Ant) and load the properties file you want. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Gilles Scokart [mailto:gscokart@gmail.com] > > > > > > > > > > Sent: 21 September 2007 14:28 > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can already declare new properties in your settings > > > > > file. You > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > also define properties into your ant script and use them > > > into > > > > > the > > > > > > > ivy > > > > > > > > > > files. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, just put your > > > > > /> > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > your ant script would do it for the ivy.xml file of your > > > > source > > > > > > > > module. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I don't think you can declare new properties into > the > > > ivy > > > > > > > > file. It > > > > > > > > > > Means that you can probably not do it for published > > modules > > > > (but > > > > > I > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > think you should do it anyway). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > From: Maarten Coene [mailto:maarten_coene@yahoo.com] > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: vendredi 21 septembre 2007 15:19 > > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Isn't this already available with the current version > of > > > > Ivy? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Maarten > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Foreman, Alex (IT)" < > > > > > Alexander.Foreman@morganstanley.com> > > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:10:35 PM > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would is be possible to add a properties resolution to > > ivy > > > > > > files? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eg: > > > > > > > > > > > In myVersionNumbers.properties > > > > > > > > > > > common.xerces=2.8.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can this be added for the next release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > From: Foreman, Alex (IT) > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: 11 September 2007 14:48 > > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok. We are going to have to do some fiddling :D > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for help > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > From: Gilles Scokart [mailto:gscokart@gmail.com] > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: 11 September 2007 14:01 > > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can also say that you are using version range 1.2+ > > (I'm > > > > > not > > > > > > > 100% > > > > > > > > > > > sure about the syntax). In that case, when you > release > > a > > > > new > > > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > > > > of C that must replace the previous one, you give a > > > version > > > > > > number > > > > > > > > > > > like 1.2.2. If the new version must not replace the > > > > previous > > > > > > one, > > > > > > > > > > > publish it with 1.3.0 or 2.0.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, if you want to take a different decision per > > module, > > > > then > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > will always have to republish a new ivy.xml file for A > > and > > > B > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > there is a new version of C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Foreman, Alex (IT) > > > > > > > > > > > > [mailto:Alexander.Foreman@morganstanley.com] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 14:33 > > > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I saw that but was a little unsure on how it worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if we released a new Version of C but we didn't > > > want > > > > A > > > > > or > > > > > > B > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > use it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Gilles Scokart [mailto:gscokart@gmail.com] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: 11 September 2007 09:50 > > > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want that, you have to say that A and B are > > using > > > > the > > > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "latest.integration" of C (or an other version > > pattern) > > > > > inside > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > ivy.xml file of A and B. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Foreman, Alex (IT) > > > > > > > > > > > > > [mailto:Alexander.Foreman@morganstanley.com] > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 10:43 > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Central version numbering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Consider this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artifact A relies on Artifact C, but does not > expose > > > it > > > > as > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > transient > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artifact B relies on Artifact B and also Artifact > C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now we have a situation where A and B rely on a > > > certain > > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artifact C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If in the future there is a new version of > Artifact > > C > > > > > which > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > > wish to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use we have to change the version number in A and > > > B. Is > > > > > > there > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we can somehow have one change point so that > > the > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > > > > > > number > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we wish to use is automatically picked up? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The way we are considering atm is to have a > separate > > > ivy > > > > > > file > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artifact C revision ="default" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And the default value will have the specific > > revision > > > as > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependanciy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > inside that. Or even a symlink to the correct ivy > > > file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any better way to get this behaviour? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and > > > notify > > > > > > > sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sender > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not intend to waive confidentiality or > > privilege. > > > > Use > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email is prohibited when received in error. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and > > notify > > > > > > sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sender > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not intend to waive confidentiality or > privilege. > > > Use > > > > > of > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > email is prohibited when received in error. > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and > notify > > > > > sender. > > > > > > > > Sender > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not intend to waive confidentiality or privilege. > > Use > > > > of > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > email is prohibited when received in error. > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and > notify > > > > > sender. > > > > > > > > Sender > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not intend to waive confidentiality or privilege. > > Use > > > > of > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > email is prohibited when received in error. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > ____ > > > > > > > > > > > __________ > > > > > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in > > > your > > > > > > > pocket: > > > > > > > > > > > mail, news, photos & more. > > > > > > > > > > > http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify > > > > sender. > > > > > > > Sender > > > > > > > > > > does not intend to waive confidentiality or privilege. > Use > > > of > > > > > this > > > > > > > > email > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > prohibited when received in error. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > > > > > > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > > > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > John Gill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > > > > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > John Gill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > John Gill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > John Gill > > > > > > -- > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > http://www.xoocode.org/ > -- Regards, John Gill ------=_Part_286_2163317.1190726832592--