Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ivy-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 41652 invoked from network); 3 May 2007 08:42:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2007 08:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 18116 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 08:42:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ivy-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18092 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 08:42:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ivy-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18083 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2007 08:42:17 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 01:42:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gscokart@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.170] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 01:42:09 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so398961uge for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 01:41:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=PKPIzdQOrMkc9U3op4qQ70Jbw0pCQSmcdrJW3E/VLuE289mDMqdtbRbJ4t4gK8whohEMqy5cavmH8QHGvlP6qRTeoafSC10BFYcXNgv7eqy4MKQqOPRch5QfJY0U5eKctfL79XQGpPBAUXuAt5slNLiicdz88K3D8A5hIDzvMyk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=uMKDl95mnAiD8tWTQ/eJUemntfLRA1wIeell3m3QBp22sPYBvi7vR7onu763VPguZxTIkWfAAtggHseJkQRre+Bbxx1VehHE+9vjyZpQ3gLhwg7/1EXYdWVvSo8P0FQsdWFR/fuAbsedfVUKv8vNoy1sEZAd34KpJeYil/ISOPU= Received: by 10.66.225.1 with SMTP id x1mr1766287ugg.1178181707698; Thu, 03 May 2007 01:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SCOKARTGXP ( [195.122.110.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a1sm2896230ugf.2007.05.03.01.41.44; Thu, 03 May 2007 01:41:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Gilles Scokart" To: Subject: RE: best repository layout? (opinions solicited) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 10:42:33 +0200 Message-ID: <006601c78d5e$febe11e0$2120a8c0@isabelteam.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceM3cEU/PR/M74UQtGpsDver5aUpgAgNcWg X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I never did it personally, but you should maybe consider also the [branch]. Gilles > -----Original Message----- > From: Buck, Robert [mailto:rbuck@verisign.com] > Sent: mercredi 2 mai 2007 19:17 > To: ivy-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: best repository layout? (opinions solicited) > > Hi, > > Not being an advanced user of IVY, I wanted to pass this question by the > user community. I wanted to nail down my repository layout ASAP. > > In your experience, which repository layout works best? > > Here are a couple options: > > 1. organisation/product/version-num/jars-here + > organisation/product/ivy-product-version.xml > > 2. organisation/product/version-num/jars/jars-here + > organisation/product/version-num/ivys/ivys-here > > 3. other? > > There may be considerations that I have not considered, but what I > presently have (and can change with ease) is option # 1. > > Thoughts or debate anyone? > > Thanks in advance, > > Bob > >