ant-ivy-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xavier Hanin" <xavier.ha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Will IVY-399 be in 2.0?
Date Tue, 01 May 2007 22:32:35 GMT
Hi Robert,

I already answered your question, but maybe not on the good mailing list:
http://www.nabble.com/Flexible-cache-management-%28Was-Re%3A--ANN--Ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1%29-tf3652025.html

Let us know if you need further details,

Xavier

On 5/1/07, Buck, Robert <rbuck@verisign.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A number of people voted for IVY-399, and in fact it is the most voted
> for issue. Will this make it into 2.0? I fear if it does not, it will at
> best make it into 3.0, which could be a year off, or more.
>
> The reason I ask is that this is actually a showstopper issue at
> VeriSign. We need to have caching resolvers in order to deploy IVY into
> our production build systems.
>
> Bob
>


-- 
Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/

Mime
View raw message