Hi Robert,
I already answered your question, but maybe not on the good mailing list:
http://www.nabble.com/Flexible-cache-management-%28Was-Re%3A--ANN--Ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1%29-tf3652025.html
Let us know if you need further details,
Xavier
On 5/1/07, Buck, Robert <rbuck@verisign.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A number of people voted for IVY-399, and in fact it is the most voted
> for issue. Will this make it into 2.0? I fear if it does not, it will at
> best make it into 3.0, which could be a year off, or more.
>
> The reason I ask is that this is actually a showstopper issue at
> VeriSign. We need to have caching resolvers in order to deploy IVY into
> our production build systems.
>
> Bob
>
--
Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
|