ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maarten Coene <maarten_co...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1
Date Wed, 31 May 2017 10:11:46 GMT
Why not simply <release version="1.5" date="2017-05-30"> ?That is the date the vote started
and the binaries were built?Or perhaps you could add a few days to it and make sure the vote
ends at that date?

It's just strange when reading the documentation of a released version to see that it's 'unreleased'
or 'during-release'...

Maarten


      Van: "Matèrne, Jan (RZF, Ref 410)" <jan.materne@fv.nrw.de>
 Aan: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> 
 Verzonden: woensdag 31 mei 10:25 2017
 Onderwerp: AW: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1
   
Maybe 
<release version="1.5" date="during-release" vote-starts="2017-05-30">?

Jan

-----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017 09:46
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1

On 2017-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote:

> The changes.xml still contains the following line:<release version="1.5" date="unreleased">
> I'm not sure this should block the release, but I think it would be better to fill in
the correct date.

This is a chicken and egg problem. As long as the vote hasn't passed, I
don't know the release date :-)

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


   
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message