Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49CC200BE1 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:11:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A33E7160B30; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C4A9160B18 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:11:23 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 28807 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2016 14:11:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 28796 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2016 14:11:18 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:11:18 +0000 Received: from v45346.1blu.de (v45346.1blu.de [178.254.23.72]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id E77851A0185 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by v45346.1blu.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFF98401BBE; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:11:14 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Bodewig To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Releasing Ant 1.9.8 (and maybe 1.10.0)? Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:11:14 +0100 Message-ID: <877f6whuv1.fsf@v45346.1blu.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain archived-at: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:11:24 -0000 Hi all it's been eight months since the last release and we currently have accumulated some important improvements for Java9 and seem to have fixed a serious wrapper script issue for "more traditional" Unixes. See https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/1.9.x/WHATSNEW for 1.9.8 I think that's enough to warrant a release and would volunteer to be the RM. For 1.10.0 things are less clear to me. It contains all the fixes of 1.9.8 and apart from that I only see * New file selectors , and . * New task that provides the ability to set POSIX compatible permssions via NIO's PosixFilePermission * AntClassLoader and its subclasses register themselves as parallel capable. where really only works on POSIXy file systems because that's how NIO works. Not sure whether we want to cut the release nevertheless, if so I'd be willing to manage that release as well. So what do you think? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org