Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88738200BDB for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:55:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 87375160B22; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id ADA7B160B0D for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:55:57 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 69642 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2016 10:55:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 69621 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2016 10:55:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 001AAC01AB for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4l-NWaVQjLHV for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.154]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C8A155FD23 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.170.182] by nm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2016 10:55:42 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.210] by tm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2016 10:55:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2016 10:55:39 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 154662.71426.bm@omp1019.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: dYwircIVM1mnnwjYStMR1UdyoqidwCSAZY0.wYhBwvt_U5K7cF6v4sPTDUvTZBN hJnD88QlrWxiSV1r1Pc8a3MtsIxBzv.xdIMX2WozaeqHmWAhynM9yv9JGI5iwEBpJDpfPD8qywUG IBw0imrJZ9i8LbmuXe1abnCQktLO8PeMAfxj1gYfhzoMyuMVKImIox3mlknXweNr0xog3AMRrDVM pAS3JNrC986FDIuMEt3.SP9yfCXRw7WSmi1yRNA8ooqustx.hycaEZcyprzjQnDcpDyzi0o8VWLR Y5hQCMFQxzRiIAjW1JKafK_PUxilCmJqU24m_3uP1_C80uPprk5mN0C1O1Ub2Xu8W8cELbRB3IuD Sq_zCEsD2PR0R.L5F2eYtCEosPvQu2khGuPuau515N8hmo4juR.FwEFhdlDE8s2kK2r1ZUS5hO2t g9lKXycFEmuxIY3V.wCybSN7m__w_mLyzTC3NJPxKCBF5uQUjz_TDeSXl59jZunTNrZer7pd2ZS3 UjZ_eMMSt0VWHEc3XG6TlpUAVxidK.Q-- Received: from jws400077.mail.bf2.yahoo.com by sendmailws101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:38 +0000; 1481540138.790 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Maarten Coene Reply-To: Maarten Coene To: Ant Developers List Message-ID: <481283115.1149982.1481540138545@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <9161d9ad-5ad2-5761-3b49-561b27dc6bcc@gmail.com> References: <9161d9ad-5ad2-5761-3b49-561b27dc6bcc@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1149981_1390966079.1481540138543" archived-at: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:58 -0000 ------=_Part_1149981_1390966079.1481540138543 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Jaikran, I will look at your patches, I'll try to do it this week.If possible, please attach a junit test as well to reproduce the problem. About the release, the master branch already contains some fixes since the 2.4.0 release. They are listed in the release-notes.html in the 'doc' directory. If we want to create a 2.4.1 release, we should merge all these changes (and all upcomming patches) into the 2.4.x branch as well. If we decide to create a 2.5.0 release, this merging isn't necessary. I wouldn't pin on an exact timing, we can create a release any time when we think the codebase is ready for it. We also have to find a release manager. I did it in the past when we were on SVN, but I don't have enough GIT knowledge (and I don't have the time to look into it) to do a new release. Maarten Van: Jaikiran Pai Aan: dev@ant.apache.org Verzonden: zondag 11 december 15:22 2016 Onderwerp: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release First off, I'm not an Ivy or Ant committer. The proposal that I make below for an Ivy release is based on what was discussed in a recent mail thread about the future of Ivy https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org/msg45078.html. There was a suggestion that someone from community volunteer to try and bring in some activity into the project and see if we can create a release after triaging the JIRA issues. I have had a look at the open issues in JIRA today and decided to filter out issues that are open, updated since Jan 2014 and affects versions 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4. I decided to use this as a filter criteria to just select a few that I thought can be considered "active". This [1] returns 57 issues. I went ahead and looked at those issues today and have asked for more information in the JIRAs wherever relevant and have sent a couple of pull requests [2] [3] to fix some straightforward ones. I also have another PR that I opened this week to fix one other issue. Out of those 57 issues, many are no longer relevant or don't have enough details. I don't have JIRA privileges to label them, share filters or even assign some to myself to track them better. So I think for now, we can rely on that JIRA search query [1]. At this point, I think, if we can target March 2017 for releasing a 2.4.1-Beta-1 with fixes from the list of JIRAs I think that would be a good start. Some of the issues noted in that JIRA are indeed important ones and would need some review/help in fixing them correctly, which essentially means, we need at least one person who has had experience with the Ivy code and its design details and also has the committer rights. Does any of this look feasible? Let me know if this isn't enough to move things forward - I don't want to end up sending PRs and spending time on this if there's no way we can get to a proper release in the next few months. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1553?jql=project%20%3D%20IVY%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(2.1.0%2C%202.2.0%2C%202.3.0%2C%202.4.0%2C%202.4.0-RC1)%20AND%20updated%20%3E%3D%202014-01-01%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC [2] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/11 [3] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/12 -Jaikiran --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org ------=_Part_1149981_1390966079.1481540138543--