Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1460264 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW build.xml
 src/etc/poms/ant-junit/pom.xml src/etc/poms/ant-junit4/ src/etc/poms/pom.xml
References: 
 <CACLAULiORE1X=6NBRfUTZ0aGjb_PVAVAHYPrGs0YoWs_M8Fcbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:04:11 +0100
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACLAULiORE1X=6NBRfUTZ0aGjb_PVAVAHYPrGs0YoWs_M8Fcbg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Michael Clarke's message of "Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:48:28 +0000")
Message-ID: <87hajvvih0.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On 2013-03-27, Michael Clarke wrote:

>>> * the optional ant-junit4.jar has been merged into ant-junit.jar
>>>  as Ant now requires JUnit4.

> Is it really the case that Ant requires JUnit4? The changes I
> introduced for @Ignore annotations in Ant 1.9.0 shouldn't impact
> backwards compatibility with JUnit3 and I don't believe any other
> changes in the 1.9.0 release force users to need the JUnit4 jar whilst
> running tests.

Some classes in the junit package didn't seem to compile in Gump, I
think BriefJUnitFormatter was one of them.  If you are sure the rest of
the package is still supposed to work with JUnit 3.x only - my
impression was, it wasn't - then let's revert this.

I'll try to free up some time Saturday to see what was going on.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org