Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <75993528-AF16-4722-8D51-C36EEC21A495@gmx.de>
References: <75993528-AF16-4722-8D51-C36EEC21A495@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:31:24 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAE9L6G2sbpOwZ185nmw7CkWCmMGa6SOhmVXbNWhkMvABaAdyqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ant 1.9.0
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5dbe20d5bb0104d497513e

--047d7b5dbe20d5bb0104d497513e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Antoine,
  I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase
some months back.  At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump
which I wasn't able to understand.  It might be nice to figure this out and
finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0.

br,
Matt


On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert <antoine@gmx.de>wrote=
:

> Hi,
>
> I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
>
> In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.
>
> Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?
>
> Also, Jan Mat=E8rne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce An=
t
> tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perfor=
ce.
>
> Now would be a good time to remove them.
>
> Do we need a vote for that ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Antoine
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb9=
7a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E

--047d7b5dbe20d5bb0104d497513e--