Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D69B4EEB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33847 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 15:19:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 33707 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 15:19:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 33699 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 15:19:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:19:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.173] (HELO mail-gy0-f173.google.com) (209.85.160.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:18:57 +0000 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1810568gyg.4 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=lzHiBJkX3kbmcEjvPW9/LO3FVqHANSTHETeHlBEBbOo=; b=B0oha96bXad0iunt7EdGuXhYJZd+CG35pMagsYPbRwMvgsKHwkyj0eVmRichz6y2qu yZcA7MBsdJUPqlh/9hHdldkKRh8ecOWDzFC8PpjFSF3hsHTt0OW79nOQDSPD3oNz+RQ1 7RMK4kpADjZkZ2k6Z9nAY9jYqHfAd9VxxACEQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=E8CLnNz4QGpWuAKdxR32z849ghnKfOpt5jvXiPsNIvh9tl6F3gynJj5W6b2E3WAHFG HNK1BaiYdGLZ6iriBxy5MsjZHfnvSnpA3TcYt1pgOa30nD2CqcRcbtpMY6lLeIYJer68 15+92vqynwJvRSzvkcBHhntk3FsTJA2lprA7Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.184.197 with SMTP id s45mr1882651yhm.335.1307373516563; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.167.12 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:18:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Ivy Jenkins build From: Matt Benson To: Ant Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Why do we only do a 'clean jar'? Shouldn't we be running unit tests at least? Isn't that kind of the point of CI? Perhaps 'clean coverage-report'? Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org