This is probably enough to reproduce it:
Cheers, Paul.
On 15/12/2010 7:55 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-12-15, Paul King wrote:
>
>> After a little more testing, one thing I did notice was an
>> apparent stricter treatment of property expansion.
>> With 1.8.1, having an arg to a forked java task like this:
>
>>
>
>> was happily ignored if skipFetch wasn't defined.
>> With 1.8.2, we now get a failed build with reason:
>
>> Property skipFetch was circularly defined.
>
>> The fix was to add a default property defn but it seems
>> like such a behavior change in a minor update release
>> should warrant an entry in the WHATSNEW at least?
>
> I don't think this a conscious change but rather a side effect of a
> change somewhere else. But it must be more complex than that, I don't
> get a warning like yours with
>
>
>
> ${x}
>
>
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org