Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=QIqY3bGt+fjBpBQhAEMBbZqD09FKD81lA+SxiS4asqZIE34/whRU5C56T+f8jYZ9g/CIyJoFRCHOo229AEaUwz4VrzrNMGNAI0xQ89r4fPJIOBwrZLEaLf0rZ3ycHw9fKK19xWRf/sj8ukSe7tIos4NkXTGYRp+bUwhid6oCLm4=;
Message-ID: <425530.48929.qm@web30805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <820661.71136.qm@web30801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <DE070C1A-22F8-4FFC-B019-99B2F4CABF50@hibnet.org>
 <6283A665-5834-4A08-B57C-423B87433ABA@hibnet.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maarten Coene <maarten_coene@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Ivy 2.2.0
To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <6283A665-5834-4A08-B57C-423B87433ABA@hibnet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

:-)=0A=0AI'm not sure about your other patch.=0AI'm not saying it is a bad =
patch, but I just don't know the code good enough to =0Asee if it has any o=
ther implications without further investigation.=0AThat is why I think it i=
s a bit risky to integrate it in the 2.2.0 release.=0A=0ABut I think we can=
 create a 2.2.1 release soon (read: some months) after this =0Arelease wher=
e this issue can be fixed, together with some other patches that are =0Asti=
ll waiting in our JIRA?=0A=0AMaarten=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0A=
From: Nicolas Lalev=E9e <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org>=0ATo: Ant Developers L=
ist <dev@ant.apache.org>=0ASent: Wed, September 22, 2010 3:29:44 PM=0ASubje=
ct: Re: Ivy 2.2.0=0A=0A=0ALe 21 sept. 2010 =E0 00:18, Nicolas Lalev=E9e a =
=E9crit :=0A=0A> =0A> Le 20 sept. 2010 =E0 23:46, Maarten Coene a =E9crit :=
=0A> =0A>> Hi all,=0A>> =0A>> I would like to create the Ivy 2.2.0 release =
somewhere this week.=0A> =0A> +1=0A> =0A> In the context of IVY-1227, I hav=
e found a bug which prevents useCacheOnly to =0A>work. Being quite confiden=
t in the fix, r 997711, I will merge it in the 2.2 =0A>branch unless there =
some objection.=0A=0Aha, you already merged it in fact :)=0A=0ANicolas=0A=
=0A=0A---------------------------------------------------------------------=
=0ATo unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org=0AFor additional =
commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org=0A=0A=0A      

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org