Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Mat=E8rne?= <apache@materne.de>
To: "'Ant Developers List'" <dev@ant.apache.org>
References: <87zkxu9jz6.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
In-Reply-To: <87zkxu9jz6.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
Subject: AW: Distributing Docs: Manual or whole Site?
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:31:14 +0200
Message-ID: <000401cb2393$819fa880$84def980$@de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AcsjZv5IaC7i+dVMRO2k/IZxiyBBgQALF+sQ
Content-Language: de

Having the website too would have the benefit of having the FAQ, =
externals
and projects pages.

Jan

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2010 17:11
> An: dev@ant.apache.org
> Betreff: Distributing Docs: Manual or whole Site?
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> I've just modified build.xml to create additional
> ant-@version@-manual.[zip|tar.(gz|bz2)] files containing just the
> manual
> portion of the docs - including javadocs.
>=20
> As I already offered, I'm going to create such artifacts from the past
> five binary releases and call for a vote to release them (four of them
> will go to the archive mirror more or less immediately).
>=20
> Before I do so I wanted to double check that my decision to just =
bundle
> up the manual is a good one or whether it would be better to =
distribute
> the whole docs directory which also contains the website.
>=20
> Stefan
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org