Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10177 invoked from network); 17 May 2010 19:46:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 May 2010 19:46:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 89602 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 19:19:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 89550 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 19:19:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 89542 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2010 19:19:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 19:19:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jak-ant-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 19:19:17 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OE5pz-0004W2-Ja for dev@ant.apache.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 21:18:51 +0200 Received: from c-24-218-53-21.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.218.53.21]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 21:18:51 +0200 Received: from jesse.glick by c-24-218-53-21.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 21:18:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@ant.apache.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Jesse Glick Subject: Re: Ant source structure and ant*.jar build products Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:18:42 -0400 Organization: Oracle Corp. / NetBeans Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <4BEDD539.8070506@gmx.de> <4BEEE945.5050107@callenish.com> <4BF04393.1080606@callenish.com> <4BF0853C.30106@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-218-53-21.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4BF0853C.30106@gmx.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 05/16/2010 07:52 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > I believe that Jesse meant something like "One jar should be > built from each source root". In fact his proposition does not change > the number of jars produced in the ant distribution and their contents. Correct, this would only be a change in source layout. I will send out a vote about this soon, since people's preferences on the subject differ. My comments about third-party libraries should perhaps have been put in a separate thread since that is a more or less orthogonal issue. I was not aware of (or had forgotten) fetch.xml; that should be helpful. Still not clear to me whether there is a (nonhistorical) reason for maintaining ant.jar and ant-nodeps.jar as distinct. Stefan seems to say there is not; Antoine only referred to the historical development. The question comes down to whether the distinction between "core" vs. "optional" tasks is still important independently of third-party library dependencies. Again this should be considered an independent topic, as they could be merged with or without a change in source layout. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org