Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-85555-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14544 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 20:06:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 20:06:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 74240 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 20:06:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74182 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 20:06:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74174 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 20:06:32 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 20:06:32 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0
	tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [194.109.24.33] (HELO smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.33)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 20:06:25 +0000
Received: from ubuntu (kruithof.xs4all.nl [82.95.101.186])
	by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4MK63VC081449
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <dev@ant.apache.org>; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:06:04 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from jkf@apache.org)
Received: from martijn.lan ([192.168.1.65])
	by ubuntu with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jkf@apache.org>)
	id 1OFuxP-00018z-Aj
	for dev@ant.apache.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:06:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4BF8392C.4060908@apache.org>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 22:06:04 +0200
From: Martijn Kruithof <jkf@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization
References: <hsst0t$s2p$1@dough.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <hsst0t$s2p$1@dough.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner

On 18-5-2010 4:11, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be 
> split into subtrees?
>
> [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using <selector> to 
> conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs.
>
> [ x ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where each tree maps to an output 
> JAR, may have its own classpath, and is compiled completely or not at 
> all.
>
>
> And while we're at it:
>
> Should ant.jar and ant-nodeps.jar be consolidated?
>
> [ ] No, leave these as two JAR outputs (and two subtrees if the first 
> proposal is accepted).
>
> [ x ] Yes, merge them into one ant.jar (and one subtree " " " " " "), 
> to include all tasks and types with no linkage-level deps on 3rd-party 
> libraries (even if there is an implicit dep on a 3rd-party tool such 
> as Perforce), and remove the "Core" vs. "Optional" distinction in the 
> manual.
>
>
> (Could prepare these changes on a branch if people would rather look 
> at the result before voting.)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org