Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4BC4F168.10007@callenish.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:34:16 -0700
From: Bruce Atherton <bruce@callenish.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: [Vote] Augment feature
References: <u2ge802d55e1004060816p8d702a13g92787b4e5e30d6d1@mail.gmail.com>
 <4BBD2B9A.5010907@callenish.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BBD2B9A.5010907@callenish.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ok, so this didn't start out as a vote thread, just my suggestion for 
what questions should appear in the vote. But since it has morphed into 
that I've changed the subject line to make it easier for people to find. 
So the questions are:

1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?

2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to be marked 
as final, to avoid augmentation?

3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it should default 
to "false"?

If you have already voted, no need to recast your vote.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org