Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.192 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id
         :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=T8iWynvsHKWBSukB06ULuxwZ2l9x7T4+bZNgvshUDxsvQUz/cQKnzVebuHp78GhyPE
         EilvgeQapyuOJs1Ze0LcONMKHvplpFr6R1jJS3BdUfknHM05L/hYHeYevxdE4+0mbJEr
         hhWusPiGaLi0Gu11CWpDeC9OfuFocZB4POwvA=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <7479d1a71002031258l138cdd11o6029eb3f201b69d4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A2CC9270-A2A8-4DEC-872D-046E630F5B09@gmail.com>
 <BCA6E369-B01E-4A06-A931-BC0F778C8B2C@gmail.com>
 <A7359D29-B65F-4D37-9B41-721D23296F85@gmail.com>
 <7479d1a71002031258l138cdd11o6029eb3f201b69d4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <EA235DE7-9CB6-4B92-8105-47DD30855DA3@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IvyDE updatesite packing again
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:07:30 -0600
To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>

Hi, Jon.  I realize from the text below that the problem here is a  
bug with this other tool, and believe me, I have reported it.  But  
rank hath its privileges, and being in a position to affect the IvyDE  
updatesite Hudson build I am inclined to selfishly do so.  If it is  
that big a deal I could use a locally staged updatesite to begin  
with, but this still brings to a head the problem I have which  
actually prompted my original mail:  I am not clear on how to set up  
my own local updatesite.  ;)

Thanks,
Matt

On Feb 3, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Jon Schneider wrote:

> From the Eclipse documentation concerning the pack200="true"  
> attribute we
> have on our updatesite:
>
> "This lets the Update Manager know that the site contains packed  
> jars, and
> it will look for a .jar.pack.gz file beside the .jar file that it  
> would
> normally download. If the .jar.pack.gz file is found, it will be  
> downloaded
> and unpacked, otherwise the .jar file is downloaded as normal."
>
> This indicates to me that a reasonable local test would be to  
> delete all but
> the packed jars from a locally staged update site and verify that  
> the Update
> Manager will pick up the feature jar correctly.
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> My original email seems to have been lost; please see below:
>>
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>  For fun I'll include the text of my patch file between --- and --- :
>>>
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>>
>>  ---
>>> On Feb 3, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
>>>  Apparently some tools (in particular I'm back to dealing with  
>>> Genuitec
>>>> Pulse) want not only plugins but features jars to be packed.  I  
>>>> can pretty
>>>> well see how to add this to the updatesite build, but I don't  
>>>> have a whole
>>>> lot of idea what is required for me to test my changes locally.   
>>>> Can either
>>>> of you guys, Nicolas/Jon, help me with that?  I'm hoping to do  
>>>> it all on Mac
>>>> OSX Tiger w/ Java 1.5....
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org