Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org does not designate 216.86.168.183 as permitted
 sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:08:27 -0500
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nicolas_Lalev=C3=A9e?= <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org>
To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: IvyDE 2.1.0 Release
In-Reply-To: <7479d1a71002031724o5ba2be16x452d29b142f44eb1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7479d1a71002030641n61830411iff60c9d9eb55a3de@mail.gmail.com>
 <675463.75030.qm@web30808.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <7479d1a71002031724o5ba2be16x452d29b142f44eb1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2b0953c6281e1016ef6247c2a2a79778@mail.mxes.net>
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3-stable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:24:22 -0600, Jon Schneider <jkschneider@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It is meant to be an RC1.

I am a bit confused too. We didn't talked about doing a RC, just a 2.1.0,
a final one.
Do you want to do an RC ? I am confident in the stability of the current
code, I am fine with going out without RC. And if there are some major bugs
found quickly, we could roll out quickly too a 2.1.1.

Nicolas


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Maarten Coene
> <maarten_coene@yahoo.com>wrote:
> 
>> Jon,
>>
>> I'm a bit confused. Did you build a IvyDE 2.1.0-RC1, or did you build
>> IvyDE
>> 2.1.0 final?
>>
>> I have some questions/remarks:
>> - the binary distribution files don't have a seperate doc folder (like
>> the
>> ivyde-2.0 binary distributions), the documentation structure starts
>> directly
>> at the root
>> - what is the purpose of the file 'version.properties' in your
>> ivyde-2.1.0
>> directory?
>>
>> If you did build the IvyDE 2.1.0-final:
>> - the version of the ivyde plugin on the update site doesn't has a
>> "final"
>> in it's name (which was the case with previous ivyde releases). If I'm
>> not
>> mistaken there was a reason to include this "final" in the version, but
I
>> can't remember what is was.
>>
>>
>> There is no need to announce this to the ivy-user list before there has
>> been a vote on this list ...
>>
>> Maarten
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Jon Schneider <jschneider@apache.org>
>> To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
>> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 3:41:14 PM
>> Subject: IvyDE 2.1.0 Release
>>
>> I have built a release candidate for IvyDE 2.1.0. You can download the
>> distribution at [1].  A staging updatesite has been deployed at [2].
>>
>> I went through the whole set of documentation and corrected spelling
and
>> grammar and made a few clarifying points here and there.
>>
>> I've signed the artifacts, but seeing as I'm kind of new here, nobody
>> else
>> has signed my key.  I'm not sure how picky folks will be about this. 
If
>> it
>> will be a problem, somebody else can sign it before the deployment of
the
>> final build.  Should we announce the release candidate on ivy-user
prior
>> to
>> a vote on the final release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jon
>>
>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~jschneider/ivyde-2.1.0/
>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~jschneider/staging/updatesite/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org