Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: [POLL] target-groups
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:19:55 +0100
Message-ID: <873a3dycgk.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

before we get carried away with naming discussions ...

Currently I don't feel there is consensus of what we'd like to see with
target-group (if anything at all).  The options I see are

  * have some sort of composite of targets that other targets can add
    themselves to

  * have some special construct that has a depends list similar to
    target.  targets can depend on such a construct and add themselves
    to the depends list (the current code base).

  * allow targets to add themselves to the depends lists of any other
    target

  * allow targets to add themselves to the depends lists of targets that
    in some way mark themselves as being open for such extensions

  * no target-group like construct at all

  * something completely different?

What is your preference?

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org