Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27089 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2009 21:33:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Dec 2009 21:33:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 45675 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 21:33:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 45577 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 21:33:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 45567 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2009 21:33:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:33:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.59.134.9] (HELO idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca) (64.59.134.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:33:07 +0000 Received: from pd5ml3no-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.153.148]) by pd5mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2009 14:32:45 -0700 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=1 a=DEltu9IsbBYtKWnTet26fQ==:17 a=88BVNp-FNrCVCNfS6v8A:9 a=YMigynszaBz4GV_EFYQA:7 a=eTYMSqUFtTWA3_68Xt2aE88IvIgA:4 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.107]) ([96.49.148.215]) by pd5ml3no-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2009 14:32:45 -0700 Message-ID: <4B33DE01.5090604@callenish.com> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:32:49 -0800 From: Bruce Atherton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Naming of target-group References: <87tyvofh9i.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> <87zl5cj4jb.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> <2F5E863B-7970-423C-86A5-49C97C180718@gmail.com> <3e48828c0912211100k5a4bbdbvbc3f0f691571def2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Coming into this thread I didn't really have an opinion, but I like this reasoning. +1 for both. Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > > Well, the main use case I see of target groups is about using them between > different build scripts, as also noted in the documentation Stefan just > wrote. So the "extension point" is more an extension point of the build > script, more than a extension point of a particular target. > So finally I quite like it. > > "extension point" cannot make me not think about Eclipse's ones. In > Eclipse the extender is called the "extension", and the extended is called > the "extension point". So I am +1 for "extension-point" in replacement of > "target-group". And for the attribute on the target I would suggest > "extensionOf". > > Nicolas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org