From dev-return-84789-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Fri Dec 11 13:10:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53674 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2009 13:10:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2009 13:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 36103 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2009 13:10:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 36000 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2009 13:10:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 35990 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2009 13:10:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:10:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jkschneider@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.223] (HELO mail-fx0-f223.google.com) (209.85.220.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:10:16 +0000 Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so992854fxm.18 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:09:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=O3FYM3RI9t365l01q3PPnC347JIdDxK/ISDaGnUXlcc=; b=WmOB/LebstZnrWFti0QDClbfDsrfIoVWz3pi00wgPe1PmNPtmv8PKUgovb1p/c4PsW +0IaN3BKIFa9uI6Y4UBbOpdHXNdPfn2G6B26I2TXJG7c54BqT7aRF46l+7hosahLaTke IIdrl+4hLXRq3M/pCA3MrEzP/IcvhmNxSMmlM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=b/a2NhAGZ9q7+d5hWSkZqQ0IfW8DCvX9xILMN2LuVoQDDXnQaPFEjQlEKQ/iHZQI2d APougG2NBtucBHU1dZ9xOepYUOyG/yVXiK7NUCQYIO9L7gHkxiekVtfpfqKhrg1iMns7 j7kz/4p0O2RKRDCd+QkfPrdPb7XH9nFtY9FuE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.64.1 with SMTP id r1mr535595muk.41.1260536996248; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:09:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9EE86F1965E19E499C80DE52AC807B5505171592@z011021.bk.fin.local> References: <7479d1a70912100754k675bb338l7774a146bdf202ab@mail.gmail.com> <457926.6881.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <9EE86F1965E19E499C80DE52AC807B5505171592@z011021.bk.fin.local> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:09:56 -0600 Message-ID: <7479d1a70912110509y2a8e5fbewe6bac92b1a383b39@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4 From: Jon Schneider To: Ant Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b63b6e33df0047a73a376 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b63b6e33df0047a73a376 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > A little warning seems to be good. "This is the last release for Eclipse 3.3. With the next version Eclipse 3.4 or newer is required." > This "3.3-Release" without the visualizer - and maybe this year? > Then after finishing the visualizer a release of the new version? I'd be happy to put together a release with a little guidance. Jon --0016e65b63b6e33df0047a73a376--