ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Levy Lambert <anto...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: [POLL] target-groups
Date Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:07:26 GMT
Hi,

I am fine with the current code base. In fact, I never experienced the 
need for target-group(s), but I can imagine myself using them if they 
are available.

Regards,

Antoine

Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> before we get carried away with naming discussions ...
>
> Currently I don't feel there is consensus of what we'd like to see with
> target-group (if anything at all).  The options I see are
>
>   * have some sort of composite of targets that other targets can add
>     themselves to
>
>   * have some special construct that has a depends list similar to
>     target.  targets can depend on such a construct and add themselves
>     to the depends list (the current code base).
>
>   * allow targets to add themselves to the depends lists of any other
>     target
>
>   * allow targets to add themselves to the depends lists of targets that
>     in some way mark themselves as being open for such extensions
>
>   * no target-group like construct at all
>
>   * something completely different?
>
> What is your preference?
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message