Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <25622292.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Raja Nagendra Kumar <Nagendra.Raja@tejasoft.com>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: SubAnt performance
In-Reply-To: <87tyyrh4qq.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <25605193.post@talk.nabble.com> <87pr9fvfmw.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
 <25606351.post@talk.nabble.com> <87tyyrh4qq.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>


>Then I'd think subant is the wrong task in that context.  I don't
> understand why you'd be calling subant "on yourself" anyway.

we have a target like 'clean' which deletes current directories 'build'
folder and calls all the sub directories clean target. The sub directories
build build file calls the same clean target..

the clean targets is impl. some thing very similar to recursions with
different directory roots sets by subant.

Regards,
Nagendra  
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SubAnt-performance-tp25605193p25622292.html
Sent from the Ant - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org