idem, +1 Nicolas Le 7 sept. 09 à 12:50, Gilles Scokart a écrit : > Same here, > OK for a 2.1.0 with r801820 merge, and OK for 2.1.1 without an > "external" RC > first (having zip on which to vote is a suffisent "release > candidate" step). > > Thanks, > > > Gilles Scokart > > > 2009/9/7 Xavier Hanin > >> I'm ok for a 2.1.0 release with r801820 merged. >> For a 2.1.1 I'm not sure a RC is really necessary... If we have >> only bug >> fixes without too heavy changes I think releasing 2.1.1 directly >> without >> prior RC is ok. If something goes wrong we can release a 2.1.2 and >> that's >> fine. >> >> BTW, thanks a lot Maarten for your involvement and for stepping in >> for this >> release! >> >> Xavier >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 23:36, Maarten Coene >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the second release candidate for Ivy is now some weeks old and >>> it's time >> we >>> decide what to do next. >>> >>> I'd prefer to promote this RC2 as final 2.1.0 release, but merge >>> revision >>> 801820 from trunk which fixes a regression introduced in RC2. >>> Furthermore, since trunk contains fixes for some annoying bugs, we >>> could >>> create a 2.1.1 release candidate later this month after the 2.1.0 >>> final >>> release is out. >>> >>> I'm willing to do the 2.1.0 final release if there a no other >>> volunteers. >>> >>> Maarten >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Xavier Hanin - 4SH France - http://www.4sh.fr/ >> BordeauxJUG creator & leader - http://www.bordeauxjug.org/ >> Apache Ivy Creator - http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org