ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.1.0-rc2 Release
Date Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:45:39 GMT
On 2009-07-05, Maarten Coene <maarten_coene@yahoo.com> wrote:

> You can download it from this URL:
> http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/ivy/staging/2.1.0-rc2/

checksums and signatures are fine.

The zips contain an empty doc/reports/ivy directory that is not inside
the tars - intentional?  Certainly no reason to hold up the release.

The -with-deps archives don't contain build.xml, this looks wrong but
may be fixed with the next RC or the final packaging.

The -with-deps archives should contain the JSch license.

The svn external for xookie should use a fixed revision number.

There are a few files and directories in the svn tag that are not
inside the source distribution.  Is this intentional?

The docs in svn and the source distribution are different - do they
get modfied via Xookie during the distribution build?

The top level ivy.xml files in svn and the source dist are different
(looks as if the XML formatting had changed).

A few files are inside the src dist that are not in svn

,----
| Only in apache-ivy-2.1.0-rc2/doc: book.html
| Only in apache-ivy-2.1.0-rc2/doc: reports
| Only in apache-ivy-2.1.0-rc2/: ivy.xsd
| Only in apache-ivy-2.1.0-rc2/test/repositories/checkmodified: ivy-1.0.xml
| Only in apache-ivy-2.1.0-rc2/test/repositories/checkmodified: mod1.1-1.0.jar
| Only in apache-ivy-2.1.0-rc2/test/repositories/norevision: ivy-mod1.1.xml
| Only in apache-ivy-2.1.0-rc2/test/repositories/norevision: mod1.1.jar
`----

rat isn't happy with a few files in doc (most of the in tutorials/log)
and test, but none of them look serious.  I can provide the complete
report if you want to.

> Do you vote for the release of these binaries?

The only thing we really release are the source distributions,
anything else are convenience builds - picking nits, I know.

I'm in discussion with myself whether the lack of JSch license is
enough to veto the release, I won't give it my +1 for now.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message