From dev-return-84227-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Mon Jun 08 12:51:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75212 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2009 12:51:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2009 12:51:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 44881 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2009 12:51:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 44831 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2009 12:51:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 44821 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2009 12:51:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:51:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gscokart@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.218 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.218] (HELO mail-bw0-f218.google.com) (209.85.218.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:51:04 +0000 Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so3342752bwz.28 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZLqcjDaBDlJfdUgylCpL0MObdvQVN4yQE+/lfEF72k8=; b=NyPKP67pMfEgkkctxlcZ5E2akm5rYEoNT76qP/OmtWDQRUSpfdAPI6STOloQ5x6d1r hL8U1KGyOV/T+0wz8PVKHfgKKfUCDRxxwX4bE9oj66dHO3E2+LM2eHGJtfc7mCqyXMEw iILK0RwY8TNGF7ipAIg5DY324FQC6uMIA6KuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Nq91SzCAQzXN3oeBUtHRVbQtdgCN+cWHH/wDLW8Rs9rOMDBEVsmJHSm4tmmhlUYcj6 KlXh1PCQ5nMAd1vnbsEVXfsTq3qiLvj6+bWuglpiW6zGxhuGNPTpFgxpuovHDGVkkdx2 R16FDp8dJrkIwPG1TeR6wnijDJGhyjzWrxbg0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.110.200 with SMTP id o8mr4042427fap.56.1244465444261; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <635a05060906060450h75c01abcw218a571a5dbe8d29@mail.gmail.com> References: <635a05060906060450h75c01abcw218a571a5dbe8d29@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:50:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Releasing IvyDE ? From: Gilles Scokart To: Ant Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a9b1bd8e99046bd5b063 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5a9b1bd8e99046bd5b063 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2009/6/6 Xavier Hanin > 2009/6/4 Nicolas Lalev=E9e > > > Hi everyone ! > > > > 6 month ago we released a beta version of IvyDE 2.0. Now we have a good > > among of bug resolved thanks to the report and patch of our users [1]. > > There are still 3 bugs opened: > > * IVYDE-170 [2] : I think this bug exist, but quite hard to reproduce. = I > > don't think this should be a blocker though. > > * IVYDE-178 [3] : I reproduced the bug, but as commented in there, the > fix > > will bring some major refactoring. > > * IVYDE-180 [4] : I wasn't able to reproduce it > > > > So I think it is a good time to release a 2.0 final. > > > > WDYT ? > > I think IvyDE is stable enough, and it will make people more confident in > using it with an official release. So it's a strong +1 for me. > Xavier > > +1. An official release will definitively help for adoption. Gilles Scokart --001636c5a9b1bd8e99046bd5b063--