From dev-return-84229-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Tue Jun 09 19:48:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92793 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 19:48:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 19:48:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 28180 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 19:48:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 28058 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 19:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 19:48:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:48:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=PLING_QUERY,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.186] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:48:39 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.2] (p4FEAB352.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.234.179.82]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKv1o-1ME7Ix0pXw-000jh5; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:48:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4A2EBC82.405@schillbaer.de> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:48:18 +0200 From: Gilbert Rebhan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Users List , Ant Developers List Subject: ant 1.7.1 bug in with antcall !? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19fJ4jVJ8P5IJyea+tuImdfKUjdMlIyFXsmPg1 f7azwKe0hQOnqwRKiss9FgTRPsaf3cbYrn5G0YbFTHB6+Rofkn cStVSHZoCKyWIDFufYVUg== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, after (finally) upgrading from ant 1.6.5 to ant 1.7.1 a teammate discovered some strange behaviour = He makes heavy use of antcall and uses the task. Now with ant 1.7.1 there are a lot of 0 byte lines in the logs, his editor jumps automatically in hexmode when opening such a logfile. Compared to ant 1.6.5 several parts of the logs are missing - probably overwritten by those 0 byte lines. Whether heavy use of antcall is good or bad style, that behaviour of task in ant 1.7.1 is _very annoying_, as important parts of the logs are missing now after the upgrade. There was already a similar posting on the ant user list = http://marc.info/?l=ant-user&m=123900769210029&w=2 but got no repsone. So, is that a known bug among other users|developers, didn't find a record in the bug database ? Maybe it's already patched in repository !? Any suggestions or workarounds ?? Regards, Gilbert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org