Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-83947-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54203 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2009 12:43:32 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2009 12:43:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 1183 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2009 12:43:32 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 983 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2009 12:43:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 972 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2009 12:43:31 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:43:31 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [88.84.142.181] (HELO samaflost.de) (88.84.142.181)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:43:24 +0000
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by samaflost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E31E220016
	for <dev@ant.apache.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:43:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from samaflost.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (v30161.1blu.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 03390-02 for <dev@ant.apache.org>;
 Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:43:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by samaflost.de (Postfix, from userid 2525)
	id 1A213E220014; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:43:02 +0100 (CET)
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bugzilla Issue 45902 (Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to
 comparison of dir timestamps)
X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 92419)
References: <y1utz7j93s9.fsf@v30161.1blu.de> <glqaai$9bq$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<y1uk58ext13.fsf@v30161.1blu.de> <glsn92$k06$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:43:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <glsn92$k06$1@ger.gmane.org> (Jesse Glick's message of "Thu\,
 29 Jan 2009 11\:59\:13 -0500")
Message-ID: <y1umyd9rmlm.fsf@v30161.1blu.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at samaflost.de
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 2009-01-29, Jesse Glick <jesse.glick@sun.com> wrote:

> Stefan Bodewig wrote:

>> Did I sound like "if you think you understand Zip.java better than I
>> do"?  If so, please forgive me, this was in no way intended.

> I just meant that you likely have a deeper understanding of Zip - and
> in particular the newer resource collection framework - than I do.

I really needed to double check I wasn't getting accross in a strange
way since that would be the last thing I wanted to do.  Thanks.

The "ZipExtraHeader is hard coded to be four byte" issue is next up on
my list and I hope to find some time next week to look more deeply
into this issue.  I'll start by adding a bunch of tests and will try
to see where we get.  This doesn't mean that nobody else could get
there before me.

One of the bigger problems of the <zip> family of tasks is that they
are very old, have a lot of protected methods and that we know they
are used as extension points by many external libs - so any change
must live inside the constraints of API backwards compatibility -
that's why the code is what it is.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org