ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Maybe we should open up "depends" for all targets
Date Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:56:35 GMT
On 2008-11-20, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
>> target-group is-a target.  A "plain target" is a target as opposed to
>> a target-group.

> Since I have conceptualized them in my head as something different
> than targets, I forget that implementation-wise they remain targets.

Not only implementation-wise, also in my head, conceptually.

> I actually think it would be better if the code made them distinct
> classes, possibly extracting an interface for the perform and
> dependency getting parts, but that's a different story. From the
> user and documentation perspective, the fact that a target-group is
> a target under the cover should be de-emphasized IMHO.

I wonder what sort of difference between target and target-group
people see, I don't seem to get it, sorry.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message