Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69584 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 10:10:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 10:10:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 74433 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 10:10:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 74093 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 10:10:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 74082 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 10:10:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:10:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of foamdino@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.184] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:09:39 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so2855295nfb.10 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:09:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=+UmUMkn1UtLrK6xeUoly8X5qFa7JtHuu1GzDBOShZTQ=; b=reIQZK48XDUwNjq5KV6rsfA0muvjnIbzOJLB2OIesm3i/+/J+KmGhWqfZE93pEBfvq zbhj+z2fWFeU+KEU6jRiJhqQ9yASsolgmIPm3uxhqGdFEA//wA9ivK3BlYcH+HcqKzrx KjdrexcciaPq27NVTRQ1HaLyn0RsMyTsnhyRY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=u9rXKKCMr7cAmrHSOQkCrso79Umg5NWpeRSednUgXra3DVf7zItt8gttaaM7el1O/1 CIk4ZC+O7CtkRgKtMNoxzfnMMno42asTHOyU94f+bvCUMhQqVHK7cmFY+JA9R35Ih64j PsFl3L5m0ILDm9/YMkDkHuX32/2x0HNHQJ8r8= Received: by 10.103.141.8 with SMTP id t8mr2717725mun.119.1221732593734; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.102.228.4 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:09:53 +0100 From: "Kevin Jackson" To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: DirectoryScanner performance In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > The tests are not through yet, but one thing was so surprising to me > that I wanted to show it upfront: > > Running the matchall target (of sr/etc/performance/dirscanner.xml): > > Ant 1.6.5 1 min 30 s ~ 19 MB > Ant 1.7.0 3 min 53 s ~ 24 MB > Ant 1.7.1 10 s ~ 14 MB > > So 1.7.0 took more than twice as long as 1.6.5 to find all files in a > big directory tree without any patterns and 1.7.1 is a whole lot > faster than even 1.6.5. That's a huge difference - what are we doing now in 1.7.1 that is different from before? Kev --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org