Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56517 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2008 23:28:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2008 23:28:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 3016 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2008 23:28:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 2964 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2008 23:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 2953 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2008 23:28:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:28:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ddevienne@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.18] (HELO mail-gx0-f18.google.com) (209.85.217.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:27:32 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so8156051gxk.4 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wOBM9aUVv0ajYEC/aFHs9y2V6+hMQgxhI2EG97wYOZY=; b=aBVO3ruPMTFq2EJLI/LO/XEs/K6+0o+uRwdx/gLa9azhTGu680l7FhEcWYdhwGV93H sTgWoS7AsF4GgORgCcsuaNDjN24nn1Db0r2jXagggp6bHhF58Ym/IyPJK1kjD6qw0dw7 bdYCJ5h0SKF17qeMBaHmey/weefL1D8e2EAs4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YtXCo38WLS4zj0h2tbdPTbTKh4En8W2aub08wQIll7kB+p143iiS9CnLUbOTo6u3hQ vj90JU/wdQ8iDaFxVqaIRKuwkqEdv2AXrwapW+HLecFxaknLczuU0tChTtJVvJH0BEde N9ZdzGzgKum9Oy3OUIes/aDao3MLoXUPIETvw= Received: by 10.100.214.19 with SMTP id m19mr2544023ang.1.1221089283357; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.197.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <255d8d690809101628l1b0736b3scc29befdf8cb9ae4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:28:03 -0500 From: "Dominique Devienne" To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: DirectoryScanner and Symlinks In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <255d8d690809080925wbb8892dra942487cb837175f@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Gilles Scokart wrote: > If I take the example, > I <-----\ > / \ | > / \ | > B C | > / \ | > / \ | > file.txt A--/ > > and I start with /, with the pattern /**/*.txt, even with a > maxLevelsOfSymlinks 1, I will get > /B/file.txt > /C/A/B/file.txt > > Clearly, you get twice the same file. Maybe that's not what the user > want. But which one should we choose? What matters most is to not get into infinite loops. If someone puts cycles in its links, I'm not sure there's much we can do more than avoid the infinite loop. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org