Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31559 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2008 11:54:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2008 11:54:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 69806 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2008 11:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 69772 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2008 11:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 69760 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2008 11:54:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:54:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of carej@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.150 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.150] (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:53:31 +0000 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7EBlPXc011685 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:47:25 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m7EBrwcm077132 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:53:58 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m7EBrw2X012008 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:53:58 -0600 Received: from d03mc015.boulder.ibm.com (d03mc015.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.29]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m7EBrwll012001 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:53:58 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <20080807084154.BB82623889C4@eris.apache.org> To: "Ant Developers List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: svn commit: r683552 - in /ant/ivy/core/trunk: ./ doc/use/ src/java/org/apache/ivy/ant/ src/java/org/apache/ivy/core/report/ src/java/org/apache/ivy/core/resolve/ test/java/org/apache/ivy/ant/ X-KeepSent: 66529FC5:4AAE7848-852574A5:00412751; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.1 HF105 April 10, 2008 From: Jeffrey E Care Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:53:56 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03MC015/03/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 08/14/2008 05:53:58, Serialize complete at 08/14/2008 05:53:58 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0041597D852574A5_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0041597D852574A5_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" "Gilles Scokart" wrote on 08/14/2008 04:46:55 AM: > I remember a discussion about lower case / mixed case attributes of > the ivy ant task but I don't remind me the conclusion and I didn't > find it back. I don't think the parser cares, right? I've seen plenty of build.xml files where the same attribute of the same task was capitalized 10 different ways & they all work fine. Unless you're asking about code style or something... --=_alternative 0041597D852574A5_=--