Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xavier.hanin@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.241 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=dGOgMzGwwTX2s/nmJTKo6B1PiN7mTPhusArwWvld0REtyAUaj71dy3fulFz3biwuh9mqsgf/dRqLa5jeyIU1WNhcX2+O52ECqbdmIrYP2s2qhIipnapOJivUyoQ8Mg3st3+uFKYsEzvXUVLVmB2UeJbP3uLZlrVd0kZQFJvz7mo=
Message-ID: <635a05060804171121j64c49236wdd1baf73086d0ba7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:21:15 +0200
From: "Xavier Hanin" <xavier.hanin@gmail.com>
To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0
 planning)
In-Reply-To: <48078DA1.9090908@callenish.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_514_9219304.1208456476017"
References: <635a05060804160055p441383b2k89c7d1cebbff8e3a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4806A8CB.20001@callenish.com>
	 <635a05060804162348w5c5abfa9y7cc276a27962b35c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200804171038.44408.nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com>
	 <635a05060804170846r5e65c721i760495f5dfa79a45@mail.gmail.com>
	 <48078DA1.9090908@callenish.com>

------=_Part_514_9219304.1208456476017
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Bruce Atherton <bruce@callenish.com> wrote=
:

> Typically you would use a new Status, but I am uncertain about how much
> control you have over the Apache Jira instance. Can you introduce new
> workflow for your project?

It seems I can, but I'm not sure about the policy. Maybe other Ant members
can comment on this?


>
> I don't think that merely setting the priority should result in moving
> between Open and In Progress. There should be an intermediate state.

Cocoon workflow has "OnHold" and "Continued" status, that we could use to
indicate that all bugs are OnHold until we review their priorities.

What do you guys think?

Xavier


>
>
> Xavier Hanin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Nicolas Lalev=E9e <
> > nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I am in favor of a such classification too. About the process to
> > > classify
> > > them, I would say that it would be the same process as fixing issues.
> > > A
> > > committer get interested to an issue, try to found out to what's
> > > behind,
> > > and
> > > then decides its priority. And the other committers check via the
> > > notifications@ant list.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > But how do we know that the issue priority has been reviewed, especiall=
y
> > if
> > it doesn't change?
> >
> > Xavier
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>


--=20
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/

------=_Part_514_9219304.1208456476017--