ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org>
Subject Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0 planning)
Date Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:58:56 GMT

Le 18 avr. 08 à 12:07, Xavier Hanin a écrit :

> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Gilles Scokart <gscokart@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> On 17/04/2008, Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com>  
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But how do we know that the issue priority has been reviewed,
>> especially if
>>>> it doesn't change?
>>>
>>>
>>> ha, good point :)
>>>
>>
>> Maybe updating the target release...  Using the release 2.0-RC1 and
>> creating a new release named 'later'.
>
> This is the easiest thing to do, it doesn't require changing the  
> workflow.
> BTW, instead of creating a release named 'later', we can simply use  
> the
> "Unknown" entry, which let issues appear as "unscheduled" in Ivy  
> page on
> JIRA.
>
> If I sumup the proposal is that any committer can review any issue  
> currently
> marked with fix for 2.0, change its priority if required, and change  
> the fix
> for to 2.0-RC1 if the priority is blocker or critical, and Unknown  
> if the
> priority is lower. All issues will be considered reviewed once  
> there's no
> more issue with fix for 2.0.
>
> Do we all agree to use this strategy?

Sounds good.
+1

Nicolas


>
>
> Xavier
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gilles Scokart
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> http://xhab.blogspot.com/
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
> http://www.xoocode.org/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message