ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xavier Hanin" <xavier.ha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is our objective for 2.0 too ambitious? (was Re: Ivy 2.0 planning)
Date Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:21:15 GMT
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Bruce Atherton <bruce@callenish.com> wrote:

> Typically you would use a new Status, but I am uncertain about how much
> control you have over the Apache Jira instance. Can you introduce new
> workflow for your project?

It seems I can, but I'm not sure about the policy. Maybe other Ant members
can comment on this?


>
> I don't think that merely setting the priority should result in moving
> between Open and In Progress. There should be an intermediate state.

Cocoon workflow has "OnHold" and "Continued" status, that we could use to
indicate that all bugs are OnHold until we review their priorities.

What do you guys think?

Xavier


>
>
> Xavier Hanin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Nicolas Lalevée <
> > nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I am in favor of a such classification too. About the process to
> > > classify
> > > them, I would say that it would be the same process as fixing issues.
> > > A
> > > committer get interested to an issue, try to found out to what's
> > > behind,
> > > and
> > > then decides its priority. And the other committers check via the
> > > notifications@ant list.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > But how do we know that the issue priority has been reviewed, especially
> > if
> > it doesn't change?
> >
> > Xavier
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message