ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xavier Hanin" <xavier.ha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy
Date Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:09:23 GMT
Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I can't
make the choice alone, and we need to deal with that question before
2.0final to close IVY-297. So, anyone has an opinion about this:

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Xavier Hanin <xavier.hanin@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As reported by IVY-297, Ivy suffers from some name inconsistencies and
> strange attribute names. Ivy 2.0 is a good opportunity to fix some of
> them, since I think we can afford some more deprecation warnings.
>
> So I'd like to fix IVY-297 by marking allownomd as deprecated, and
> providing a descriptor="required | optional" attribute.
>
> To go further, we could rename the attribute skipbuildwithoutivy in
> buildlist in skipbuildwithoutdescriptor, or even better change it to
> buildwithoutdescriptor="skip | fail | warn | tail | head", which wold make
> it both more readable and more powerful.
>
> Another area where the name 'ivy' is used to talk about module descriptors
> in general is patterns. This lead to some strange settings, where you give
> an 'ivy' pattern to tell where the poms are. In this case I think we could
> support both 'ivy' and 'descriptor' (for resolver patterns for instance),
> since the use case for ivy files is still predominant, so I don't think
> deprecating the old name would really be better.
>
> So, what do you think about these changes?
>
> Xavier
>
>
-- 
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message