Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xavier.hanin@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.186 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=iT4jWu1mdTTlBtXvVjPKSXJCkmYaGOhy6VOA6DJcrx90Uln5lzJkWH/A7jKvu+iP+qZjaAnPNRjfTcIQ2+qkzvoE0ejW82qHu5Ot/nGDllz2ODYKd4vh9dWY2ee84VrbI1vFIZpxiBarcl7JZZOMQzkSAlgquCTGnvWY9JVLqhw=
Message-ID: <635a05060802290257q4d4da494j1177cd3e0de3cb8b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:57:11 +0100
From: "Xavier Hanin" <xavier.hanin@gmail.com>
To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Ivy 2.0 planning
In-Reply-To: <e9d8a2610802290233j6f47f70bw5597ae6939715ee7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_9786_5151358.1204282631738"
References: <635a05060802281032w1de22ea1jc04b633e2ed5a3df@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e9d8a2610802290233j6f47f70bw5597ae6939715ee7@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_9786_5151358.1204282631738
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Gilles Scokart <gscokart@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.  Now we should foccus on getting 2.0 out.
> So stability, and fix the bug in major 2.0 feature : maven repository
> compatibility.
>
> But I have noted that the list of bug is quiet long...  So any patch is
> more
> than welcome :-)

90 open issues assigned to 2.0! Even though some are very straight forward
to fix, it's still a lot of remaining work! So I second Gilles call for help
of any kind :-)

Xavier

>
>
> Gilles
>
> On 28/02/2008, Xavier Hanin <xavier.hanin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ivy 2.0 beta 2 being around the corner, I've reviewed some of the
> current
> > open issues in JIRA. I've marked all open bugs to be fixed in 2.0, as I
> > would like to make 2.0 final as stable and clean as possible. I even
> think
> > that fixing bugs should be our main focus now toward 2.0 final. The
> > current
> > feature set is pretty good, so if we don't want to dilute too much our
> > effort and the time frame for 2.0 final, I think focusing on bug fix is
> a
> > good option. I don't say we should stop developing features, sometimes
> we
> > may have some needs or specific interest in some new features. Moreover
> > fixing bugs is not the most entertaining thing to do, so we'll probably
> > need
> > some rest with more interesting stuff :-).
> >
> > So, do you guys agree with this plan?
> >
> > Xavier
> >
> > --
> > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> > http://xhab.blogspot.com/
> > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
> > http://www.xoocode.org/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gilles Scokart
>


-- 
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/

------=_Part_9786_5151358.1204282631738--