Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15258 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2008 07:41:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 07:41:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 96520 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2008 07:41:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 96461 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2008 07:41:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 96449 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2008 07:41:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:41:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of peter.kitt.reilly@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.182] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:41:07 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so736752pyh.17 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:41:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Kg5M+7mouFgl1xsf2ieUrUDguTFMESoVlYuIt6IvIg8=; b=YBxEr0bGv26FHVT5T4rKTXVmuF7mVUgcYaBtwXDJbWOuxfcQPqagF+2hN0K3CMsWHxzn/oUEVhzemMwej2T2t5sPa9ne6sXeG97fnWDVfeATHP/SqoTMkQhS2zvxwMYInv08832RtDoNPAIZeZDvkSqrVGLNn0eS7UzTIOKmbtU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cdgbVuZdzJaDizPaTNCP+XzoTit3sIRji5CXQb+hWEQG4K1u7G/cyUS4Iu/qMocQj8MxZTITK8EIWGYNeGK97Ag5bSwU6lM/mxCidi49ich+EbJjkVhkPA83Ukute5YbLmI2+VN2dyl5UVi4NQNqF+MiTe7NKfrSzB1qzhy/2To= Received: by 10.143.36.15 with SMTP id o15mr970392wfj.182.1200555671958; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:41:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.172.11 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:41:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:41:11 +0000 From: "Peter Reilly" To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: AW: ant java versions In-Reply-To: <478E9F03.7010601@callenish.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <478C897C.7070304@apache.org> <478CA98D.2090101@apache.org> <478DDC4E.8040003@apache.org> <478E9F03.7010601@callenish.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 17, 2008 12:19 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: > > There are a woe-full amount of java 1.3 users as well.. > > > > Peter > > > > > > And of 1.2 users that we abandoned during the 1.7 release. But the > thinking at that time, and I think it holds up here as well, is that if > those users are too conservative to move beyond a JVM which has now > reached end-of-life, they are also too conservative to upgrade to the > latest version of Ant. > The main reason (IMO) we moved from java 1.2, was that it java5's javac generated bad byte code for java 1.2. Peter > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org