From dev-return-81924-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Thu Dec 20 10:41:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51392 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2007 10:41:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2007 10:41:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 27098 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2007 10:41:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 27048 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2007 10:41:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 27037 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2007 10:41:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:41:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gscokart@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.172] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:41:02 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so586010ugf.31 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:41:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; bh=4rcSKzzKz4fvRC0sVJeSKuUUFfl6HiI58CWPeWAR780=; b=jMvp1LKLKqGn6uGXUQA03evZeAJdhJQXQo/2GMT0cMk0N7iAmRjso+1QQT4GVREYu/pA8weidxBXdSffFXsfz2aK7sCUWGUnn8eLAK0RjwKZjBSdEB22PLSe9btKEfKI/9BZJrqsMKhIVcs9By7O9FLNCVjJjheZWTWZxTXo0u8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=B4SWLzz6UcYTNs7PneFMxwZWDfP8iH2jClcssc4e4tbODeXO0jQO7m2Z9baamWTsDYjyfhqM4S4U2Dzg6Cp7cakJPiZFpas/ODUTcQpyTayB04HrsfbNb+qQdOk8ZRVKrur0vjeO18JnvkGkZhTd6AYXBZWvMXheEecc9Uhpmi4= Received: by 10.66.233.14 with SMTP id f14mr3298053ugh.84.1198147264520; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from SCOKARTGXP ( [195.122.110.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w40sm2559410ugc.45.2007.12.20.02.41.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:41:03 -0800 (PST) From: "Gilles Scokart" To: "'Ant Developers List'" Subject: RE: Ivy jar packaging Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:41:01 +0100 Message-ID: <013f01c842f4$d1822580$0920a8c0@isabelteam.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AchC647DcJJitLUdSvaOCfrbtc3NogAAI7gg X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Reilly [mailto:peter.kitt.reilly@gmail.com] > Sent: jeudi 20 d=E9cembre 2007 10:34 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Ivy jar packaging >=20 > On Dec 19, 2007 7:49 PM, Gilles Scokart wrote: > > I'm confused. > > Is it really related to IvyDE or just to launching ant from eclipse? > > Also, If you don't put the the ivy ant task into the ant classpath, = but only > > the core. How does ant launched from eclipse find those tasks? > > I guess I miss something. > > > > Anyway, I think it is a good idea to simplify our main distribution. > > However, once we will have a clear published interface, I think we = could > > further split the distribution in the maven repository. > Please no, > There is quite enough jars in ant at the moment, having a number of = extra > ivy jars to make things work is not in my opinion a good idea. > Peter I was not talking about splitting the binary/source distribution. I = think we have to keep them simple, and I'm thus rather in favour of having a single ivy.jar. And if we want to put it = into the ant project, we can use this single jar. The idea that I proposed of splitting it further was only for the = distribution that we have in the maven repository. Some users might want to have only the core some will use an ftp = resolver, other will also require the ant tasks, etc. I think it could make sense to split that into individual jars when = published in the maven repository. That would allow the user to only get the class that he need. But that's not for now. Before we can do that, we will have to agree on = what is the API that we publish and for which we are willing to keep good backward compatibility. Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org