Ho, and I also forgot the private mailing list. Do we need a separated list
for ivy? I think not, but that depends probably more on you.
Gilles
2007/10/12, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>:
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Gilles Scokart <gscokart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So, one solution is to keep it like that. Use three mailing list:
> > - ivy@ant.apache.org (for user list)
> > - ivy-dev@ant.apache.org (for human dev related discussion)
> > - ivy-commit@ant.apache.org (for commit, jira and gump generated
> > mails)
>
> that would be the easiest from an infrastructure point of view. The
> list could be renamed, existing subscribers would be transferred
> automatically and the old addresses would forward for some time.
>
> > However, one of the drawback of this aproach is that we might often
> > have to put dev@ant.apache.org and ivy-dev@ant.apache.org in copy of
> > our mails.
>
> True. This might call for a general@ant list, but right now I don't
> think it will be needed that often.
>
> Dominique's suggestion would solve that easily, of course.
>
> > I think the choice also depends on how will be made the votes for
> > release, for new committers, or for other subjects.
>
> Release votes would be on the dev list of the subproject that wants to
> do the release, whichever that may be. Votes on people are not really
> conducted on public lists anyway, it just looks as if they were.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
--
Gilles SCOKART
|