ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:15:30 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665





------- Additional Comments From stevel@apache.org  2007-10-22 02:15 -------
The whole thing about filesystem granularity is trouble; it is worse on windows.

e warn about clock differences because if you have a network mounted disk on a
different clock, you are in deep trouble. 

1. <date> selectors have a granularity of 0s on unix these days, I think. Now
that Ant on DOS is NT only, we could perhaps tighten the 2s rule for windows,
and allow some property to set the default granularity if you still build on FAT
filesystems.

2. what does an ls -l of the specific files show, compared to the original file.?
3. what does the clock test in ant -diagnostics print?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message