Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64199 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 03:30:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2007 03:30:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 72765 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2007 03:30:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 72455 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2007 03:30:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 72444 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2007 03:30:36 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 20:30:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of foamdino@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.170] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 20:30:29 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so1240256ugc for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 20:30:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pITJKqDMK0qSVx66ThmNESY2wd5jz1qlUx69sX0yMeVxWMaZ5XwkxOhp+rRthJ99ULpzUFRTH/zLjL/NC/RNtS3WIYxNjc1XN6u4jAOuWX1LOMKOOi9zAAXrBgjEEsGgDNW6PC8X0faf4yQ7a5aK/2K1bzx5r7gd+aHUEwvJoZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LgWjJsBREfd6LRDcTL1aipUI5dvZ33RL0LxZevX4rqTkyO7CRUXzHmP59cooVMLFkvjYDPDw/wfIsg03itJJFmePPl2PlnnJ76N7ohddbrBWG8e4m4iue3NlvZSpEUHMB3EpVqx/CgB9K54uAUTZ2XBJgOpHVhdkusdPtRSwKBA= Received: by 10.82.156.12 with SMTP id d12mr3047723bue.1179199808163; Mon, 14 May 2007 20:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.191.1 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 20:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:30:08 +0700 From: "Kevin Jackson" To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: Retry task container In-Reply-To: <255d8d690705140649r6041f40cla68d34c4b0aa53ce@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <255d8d690705140649r6041f40cla68d34c4b0aa53ce@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > On 5/12/07, Kevin Jackson wrote: > > > > noRetries as in "Number Of Retries" or "No retries"??? good point, retry count is indeed much clearer, thank you. > > How about retrycount instead? --DD > > PS: I second all comments made so far. could live in > Ant-Contrib too, rather than Ant. > that's also valid. As for-each already exists in ant-contrib, this makes more sense there, but my original usecase was that some tasks are almost made to have a retry attribute, but I thought it would be better to have a generic retry that can be applied to anything. > PPS: If had additionally a condition to satisfy before it > executed its content, with Steve's internaltime attribute, it would > have a lot of parallels with , no? It would have some resemblance yes :) Kev --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org