Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-78308-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 84487 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 07:19:06 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 07:19:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 30898 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2007 07:19:14 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30848 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2007 07:19:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30837 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2007 07:19:13 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:13 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0
	tests=NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [193.109.238.66] (HELO dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de) (193.109.238.66)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:01 -0800
Received: from z011100.bk.fin.local (z011100.bk.fin.local [172.18.101.140])
	by dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l277ITks018444
	for <dev@ant.apache.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:18:29 +0100
Received: from z011134.bk.fin.local ([130.11.7.134]) by z011100.bk.fin.local
 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:18:38 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: AW: Javac return status
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:18:37 +0100
Message-ID: <B07F6610DABEA8438092ED2058D7F16603E1F6CF@z011134.bk.fin.local>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Javac return status
Thread-Index: AcdgZ7lgXYh/TbsFTdOlRkXCxbU6kgAIOjVQ
From: <Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de>
To: <dev@ant.apache.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2007 07:18:38.0432 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[D38BC600:01C76088]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

<javac> DOES something. It does not CHECK for something...
That's why a
    <condition>
        <javac>
makes not sence.

Otherwise a conditional compile could be done with
    <target if>
        <javac>
construct.


Jan


>-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: euge [mailto:m4euge@gmail.com]=20
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. M=E4rz 2007 04:21
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: Javac return status
>
>May be it's not the place to write my question. If yes, I'm sorry.
>
>Why is it not allowed to put javac in condition tag? Is there=20
>any reason why=20
>it was not developed? or the developers did not just get to it yet?
>
>Asking just out of curiosity.
>
>thank you=20
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org