ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter Reilly" <peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CVS - to antlib or not?
Date Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:34:48 GMT
On 3/9/07, Peter Reilly <peter.kitt.reilly@gmail.com> wrote:
> No,
> I do not like this.
>
> We have svn in ant core, and due to bc reasons
opps that should be cvs....
> we always will.
>
> I would perfer to move svn to ant core, or
> at least bundle the ant-svn antlib with the release
> of ant so that one does not have to
> do an extra download.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 3/9/07, Kevin Jackson <foamdino@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since we have an svn antlib, I was thinking should we move the cvs
> > code out of the core into it's own lib?
> >
> > I've done the majority of the work (setting up the projects copying
> > and renaming code etc), but I need to know whether this is acceptable
> > for sandbox or not?
> >
> > For BWC we could delegate calls to the normal CVS task to the antlib
> > version for now and then later remove the stub in the core after a
> > reasonable amount of time has passed.
> >
> > My rationale for doing this is to get most of the SCM stuff out of the
> > core and into separate antlibs.  CVS is just low-hanging fruit so I
> > thought we could at least give it some thought.
> >
> > Any objections?
> > Kev
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message