Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: AW: AW: Triage time
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:25:41 +0100
Message-ID: <B07F6610DABEA8438092ED2058D7F16603E1F1FC@z011134.bk.fin.local>
Thread-Topic: AW: Triage time
Thread-Index: AccdJ0SHM5HyeGVTRLuxcYCWn1QVWgAAIYvg
From: <Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de>
To: <dev@ant.apache.org>

=20

>-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:stevel@apache.org]=20
>Gesendet: Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 14:22
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: Re: AW: Triage time
>
>Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
>>>>> I'm looking at some outstanding issues with the RC and wondering=20
>>>>> whether to pull them either temporarily or indefinitely. I'd like=20
>>>>> some opinions.
>>>>>
>>>>> #1 automatic proxy setup on Java 1.5
>>>> +1 on only setting it up when required.
>>> Done. new command -autoproxy to turn auto proxy on.
>>>
>>> The -noproxy command still turns it off. I did that for backwards=20
>>> compatibility, but realised there's another value.
>>> If you have ANT_ARGS=3D-autoproxy, you can still go -noproxy on the=20
>>> command line to override it (whichever statement comes last, wins)
>>=20
>>=20
>> Proxy came in with rev 278520 (2005-08-17) [1] which was after 1.6.5=20
>> [2].
>> So I think we dont need BWC here as all was done on HEAD=20
>only (and the=20
>> 1.7.0RC).
>>=20
>> If there is no real benefit I would prefer having a "small"=20
>number of=20
>> options.
>>=20
>
>We can do that. Shall I strip it out now?


+1 from me ;-)=20
Other opinions?


Jan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org