ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martijn Kruithof ...@kruithof.xs4all.nl>
Subject Re: AntUnit
Date Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:37:43 GMT
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
> Hi,
>
> I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1.
> It is a cool way of testing ant tasks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>   
Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so definetely +1 
here.
Martijn

> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:27:08 +0000
> Von: "Peter Reilly" <peter.kitt.reilly@gmail.com>
> An: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: AntUnit
>
>   
>> On 12/22/06, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <peter.kitt.reilly@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>>>> I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
>>>>>> features in beta2, is
>>>>>> AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
>>>>>>             
>>>> Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
>>>>         
>>> Not at all.  Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
>>> of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
>>>       
>> I just had a vague memory of a request to make antunit ant 1.6 compatible,
>> but I am cool with making it depend on ant 1.7.
>>
>> So +1 for releasing antunit 1.0.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>     
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>       
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message