Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27623 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2006 20:34:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2006 20:34:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 64495 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2006 20:34:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 64460 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2006 20:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 64445 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2006 20:34:12 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:34:12 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.84.142.181] (HELO v30161.1blu.de) (88.84.142.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:33:59 -0800 Received: (qmail 21762 invoked by uid 2525); 29 Oct 2006 21:29:42 +0100 To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: and web.xml X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 77602) References: <4543BE6E.60107@apache.org> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:29:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4543BE6E.60107@apache.org> (Steve Loughran's message of "Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:32:46 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran wrote: > 4. You can then pull in a web.xml file via the webxml attribute, or > via a nested fileset. In either case we say "Although needxmlfile is > false, a web.xml file was included " ... and point to the file that > was added. Sounds good. > 5. once you set needxmlfile=false, and omit the web.xml attribute, > you can pull in a WEB-INF/web.xml from a fileset. What if there is > >1 match in the fileset? The first one added wins; there is no extra > warning message. I'd prefer a warning about duplicates. > 6. When updating an existing war file, if update=false and > needxmlfile=false, then things get complex. The problem here is that > there isnt a webxml file, so stuff from filesets get pulled in. but > dependency logic in the fileset checking engages first. Where do you see a problem? I'd still see whether we add a web.xml and treat the case similar to (4). Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org